Monday, November 23, 2009

Partnership for 21st Century Skills

http://www.21stcenturyskills.org/

I was surprised that there was an actual organization promoting a different look to learning than mandated Virginia SOL's. I am glad that there is a focus on technology, and a direction that should lead us to provide students with real multi-dimensional skills for tomorrow's careers. It goes to show that even a teacher needs to be aware of public policy. I am teaching my students about public policy involvement and what it can do for our government. Change and developing some consistency could be good for educators, administration, and schools around the country.

I saw that Virginia was not on the list of 12 states supporting the organization and its' direction. This leaves me concerned with our school. We have no real standards that assess students and their learning with technology. We are to teach skills, but there is no assessment or blended assessment that goes with other core subjects. How do we keep up with other European countries like Finland? We struggle in science and show a decline in Engineering. Do we want to keep up with the Smith's and Jones'?

In the P21(Partnership for 21st Century), the organization has brought business communities, education leaders, and policy makers together to help with and ensure children's success as citizens and workers in the 21st Century. I see companies like Ford Motors and Cisco, along with all the major tech companies joining together for this important cause. I also see that the U.S. Department of Education and the NEA on the list of supporters. This is a good start, but will it lead to better direction in our country? I'd like to see our Nation create guidelines to have all states support this new wave in education. There are so many ideas and directions that educators are getting lost and confused. Who is right? Is it possible as a whole to start agreeing on the best approaches, and stick to some consistency across the board? If that means taking power away from state governments, then let's do it and get on board.

Right now, our school and VA for that matter, is not a supporter of this action plan. At my school the direction is Mastery and assessing often through quizzes and tests. We are to use technology, but it is really on the teacher right now. The other week, someone from the county came in to check how many teachers were using the Promethean boards. They took a brief snap-shot and left to report how many teachers were using technology at that time. While, we teach for Mastery in our school I do see some obstacles when trying to provide technology skills for our students. The issue is curriculum and time. Technology activities and problem solving take time. This also cuts down on collaboration and group work.

As a teacher, I have taken steps to blend some ideals from P21 that I've been learning form my graduate program. I have started using a blog page, to help students with creativity and problem solving. I am also adapting the site, learning.blogs.nytimes.com/ in my class. The site focuses on current events and issues going on in the world. It is great for adapting civic awareness and multi-user technology skills. It is vital we find ways for students to become civic literate. I am interested to see the direction of this organization as we move on toward

8 comments:

  1. It is amazing that only 12 states have joined into this partnership. I teach in New Jersey which is in the partnership and this is the first I have heard of the 21st Century Partnership. As educators the best we can do is expose our students to these skills and get them ready for the 21st Century workplaces and communities.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I am not an American but totally agree that there should be consistency across the country so that everyone knows where the education system is headed as far as 21st century skills are concerned. We have the same problem in Canada with each province mandating their own policies and within that each board has it's own objectives. Like Scott mentioned he is in a state that is part of the 21st century partnership but he has never heard of it! How is this possible? What is it going to take to get everyone on board together....

    ReplyDelete
  3. You seem to really have combed through this site. I noticed that my state is not on that list as well. This concerns me that we are suppossed to be accountable for teaching technology without given the right tools.

    ReplyDelete
  4. In my district technology is still very much new to our vocabulary and has been very slow going. This year we just started using an online grade book/attendance/report card program and only a small group of teachers utilize the district web space to post their classroom blog. If my state does decide to adopt this 21st century skills initiative (which would be extremely beneficial for Michigan) it would be the jump start my district needs to get the "technology motor" going.

    ReplyDelete
  5. In my district in Ohio we have some technology and some classes are offered on professional development days. They are not mandatory classes and they are hit and miss. More organization needs to be put in to the effort. Our district like yours seem to emphasize state wide testing as priority one. I understand the reason because districts are graded by there performance. Yet this makes drag behind in important areas such technology.

    ReplyDelete
  6. After looking over P21 and teacher responses, it seems like we are in a cross-fire. Many states are not following these technology standards. Most states have technology standards attached to core subjects, but there is no assessing if these standards are being met.

    P21 looks to be a slow process, but a plan that would help everyone use technology to prepare for the global direction across our flat earth. Maybe sometime soon we can all get on the same page, and grow no matter what the state or district.

    Right now, all I see is assess and collect data. There is a struggle for growth in group work and collaboration to solving problems. We must find a way to bridge this gap. I wonder if we are asked to teach too much in a year. Whynot teach less content, with deeper meaning? I think this might please the results people and the help get our students where they need to be in the near future.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I think we need to know why our states are not participating. It is great that there is a foundation looking to the future. Perhaps they have not gotten commitment from many other states because of a hidden agenda or perhaps they just haven't delved into the community yet. These types of initiatives take time. We would have to do "due diligence" before we could completely understand the full intent of this group. Just like our students we can take everything on the internet at face value.

    ReplyDelete
  8. My state (Maryland) is also not a member, but as I said in my own blog, this surprises me since we seem to agree with so many of the P21 tenets. Our state has, for the last couple of years, gone so far as to formally assess the students' abilities on the technology front. We haven't been told how they've done, or in what ways this information is being used, but the very fact that such information is being gathered is significant. There are plenty of teachers (many new and young) who seem to think the technology is just another education trend that will eventually go the way of many others. The involvement of so many big league corporations should point to that not being the case.

    ReplyDelete